MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action seeking review of the Commissioner's final decision to deny Supplemental Security Income, Disability Insurance Benefits, and Widow's Insurance Benefits. Based on the parties' stipulation, the Court ordered the Commissioner's decision reversed and remanded for further proceedings. Judgment was entered on August 8, 2018.
Plaintiff now seeks an award of fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Defendant has no objection to the request. The Court has reviewed the record in the case, the motion, and the supporting materials including the award of benefits, the fee agreement with counsel, and the recitation of counsel's hours and services. Applying the standards set by Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002), the Court finds the requested fees reasonable.
The Court grants the motion [22] and awards Plaintiff's counsel $15,873.75 in attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Previously, the Court awarded Plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of $8,000 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. However, Plaintiff's attorney received only $4,225.26 of that fee, as $3,774.74 was applied toward the Plaintiff's delinquent debts in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). When issuing the section 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiff's attorney, the Commissioner is therefore directed to subtract $4,225.26 and send Plaintiff's attorney the balance of $11,648.49 less any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute. Any amount withheld after all administrative and court attorney's fees are paid should be released to the claimant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.