Emanuel v. Neven, 2:16-cv-01368-GMN-GWF. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20200227c56
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 25, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2020
Summary: ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . Upon preliminary review of the pending motion to dismiss and the state court record, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondents shall file supplemental exhibits by March 16, 2020, including: a. An internal register of actions that lists all "left side filings," or an analogous docket record, for Petitioner Troy Ray Emanuel's criminal case in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Case No.
Summary: ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . Upon preliminary review of the pending motion to dismiss and the state court record, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondents shall file supplemental exhibits by March 16, 2020, including: a. An internal register of actions that lists all "left side filings," or an analogous docket record, for Petitioner Troy Ray Emanuel's criminal case in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Case No. C..
More
ORDER
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge.
Upon preliminary review of the pending motion to dismiss and the state court record, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Respondents shall file supplemental exhibits by March 16, 2020, including:
a. An internal register of actions that lists all "left side filings," or an analogous docket record, for Petitioner Troy Ray Emanuel's criminal case in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Case No. C-12-283277-1.
b. Each of Emanuel's pro se submissions in Case No. C-12-283277-1 that were categorized as left side filings, and any other related documents.1
c. Transcripts of the hearings held on May 13, 2013; August 26, 2013; September 30, 2013; June 18, 2014; September 15, 2014; November 3, 2014; and December 3, 2014.
2. If Respondents are unable to file any supplement exhibit(s) described in this order, counsel for Respondents must file a declaration explaining why, or seek other appropriate relief.
FootNotes
1. In in accordance with LR IA 10-3 and LR IC 2-2, Respondents must not combine the pro se submissions or related documents into one exhibit but must file each as a separate attachment to the base document (i.e., the index) to receive a sequenced sub-docket number (e.g., Exhibit A (ECF No. 10-1), Exhibit B (ECF No. 10-2), Exhibit C (ECF No. 10-3), and so forth).
Source: Leagle
