Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Richard v. Howell, 2:18-cv-00181-KJD-NJK. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200206b74 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF NO. 62) KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . In this habeas corpus action, the respondents were due to file an answer by February 4, 2020. See Order entered November 6, 2019 (ECF No. 61). On January 31, 2020, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 62), requesting a 21-day extension of time, to February 25, 2020, for their answer. Respondents' counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of her obligations
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF NO. 62)

In this habeas corpus action, the respondents were due to file an answer by February 4, 2020. See Order entered November 6, 2019 (ECF No. 61).

On January 31, 2020, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 62), requesting a 21-day extension of time, to February 25, 2020, for their answer. Respondents' counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of her obligations in other cases. The petitioner does not oppose the motion for extension of time.

The Court finds that Respondents' motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of time requested.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents' motion for extension of time (ECF No. 62) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including February 25, 2020, to file their answer.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered March 29, 2018 (ECF No. 14) will remain in effect.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer