COUNTY OF ESSEX v. RUBIN, A-0714-10T3. (2011)
Court: Superior Court of New Jersey
Number: innjco20110624330
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 24, 2011
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2011
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION PER CURIAM. In this condemnation matter, defendants Gerald Rubin and the Grace Aramanda Trust argue that plaintiff County of Essex failed to engage in bona fide negotiations with them to acquire the property as required by N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, and failed to serve them with the appraisal before filing the verified complaint and order to show cause. Defendants contend the trial judge erred when she rejected their argument and grant
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION PER CURIAM. In this condemnation matter, defendants Gerald Rubin and the Grace Aramanda Trust argue that plaintiff County of Essex failed to engage in bona fide negotiations with them to acquire the property as required by N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, and failed to serve them with the appraisal before filing the verified complaint and order to show cause. Defendants contend the trial judge erred when she rejected their argument and grante..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
PER CURIAM.
In this condemnation matter, defendants Gerald Rubin and the Grace Aramanda Trust argue that plaintiff County of Essex failed to engage in bona fide negotiations with them to acquire the property as required by N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, and failed to serve them with the appraisal before filing the verified complaint and order to show cause. Defendants contend the trial judge erred when she rejected their argument and granted the order to show cause.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Patricia Costello in her August 19, 2010 opinion. The August 24, 2010 order for judgment and appointing commissioners is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Source: Leagle
