WEBBER v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR CURRY COUNTY, CIV-15-0478 WJ/LAM. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20160510d26
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 09, 2016
Latest Update: May 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES LOURDES A. MART NEZ , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER came before the Court on a telephonic status conference held on May 9, 2016. The following case management deadlines have been re-set: a) Plaintiff(s)' Rule 26 (a)(2) expert disclosure 1 : June 9, 2016 b) Defendant(s)' Rule 26 (a)(2) expert disclosure 1 : July 8, 2016 e) Termination date for discovery: August 9, 2016 f) Motions relating to
Summary: ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES LOURDES A. MART NEZ , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER came before the Court on a telephonic status conference held on May 9, 2016. The following case management deadlines have been re-set: a) Plaintiff(s)' Rule 26 (a)(2) expert disclosure 1 : June 9, 2016 b) Defendant(s)' Rule 26 (a)(2) expert disclosure 1 : July 8, 2016 e) Termination date for discovery: August 9, 2016 f) Motions relating to d..
More
ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
LOURDES A. MARTÍNEZ, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER came before the Court on a telephonic status conference held on May 9, 2016. The following case management deadlines have been re-set:
a) Plaintiff(s)' Rule 26 (a)(2) expert disclosure1: June 9, 2016
b) Defendant(s)' Rule 26 (a)(2) expert disclosure1: July 8, 2016
e) Termination date for discovery: August 9, 2016
f) Motions relating to discovery to be filed by: August 30, 2016
g) Pretrial motions other than discovery motions (including
motions which may require a Daubert hearing) filed by: September 20, 2016
h) Pretrial Order: Plaintiff(s) to Defendant(s) by: December 9, 2016
Defendant(s) to Court by: December 23, 2016
Any extension of the case management deadlines must be approved by the Court. Any requests for additional discovery must be submitted to the Court by motion prior to the expiration of the discovery deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. All expert witnesses must be disclosed by this date, but only those who are retained or specifically employed to provide expert testimony must submit an expert report. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B); Musser v. Gentiva Health Servs., 356 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 2004); Farris v. Intel Corp., 493 F.Supp.2d 1174 (D.N.M. 2007), and Blodgett v. United States, 2008 WL 1944011 (D. Utah). Expert witnesses not required to provide a written report must provide a summary disclosure under Rule 26(a)(2)(C) by this date. The parties must have their expert(s) ready to be deposed at the time they identify them and provide their reports.
Source: Leagle
