Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STACEY v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICE, LLC, 2:17-cv-02128-JAD-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171012a11 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CARRINGTON'S MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiffs, Douglas Stacey, Shellie Stacey, and Jeniece Valley, and Defendant Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC ( Carrington ), hereby stipulate and agree that Carrington shall have an additional seven (7) days, up to and including October 4, 2017, to file its reply in support of motion to dismiss, which is currently due on September
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CARRINGTON'S MOTION TO DISMISS

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiffs, Douglas Stacey, Shellie Stacey, and Jeniece Valley, and Defendant Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC (Carrington), hereby stipulate and agree that Carrington shall have an additional seven (7) days, up to and including October 4, 2017, to file its reply in support of motion to dismiss, which is currently due on September 27, 2017, pursuant to ECF No. 16. The motion to dismiss was filed on September 6, 2017, and the response was filed on September 20, 2017.

Counsel is requesting this extension in order to allow its client additional time to review the response before it is filed with the court.

This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer