Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Genesee Regional Bank v. Davis, 6:17-CV-06251 EAW (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. New York Number: infdco20170425d21 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2017
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD , District Judge . Plaintiff Genesee Regional Bank ("Plaintiff' or "GRB") commenced the abovecaptioned matter by the filing of a complaint on April 21, 2017, (Dkt. 1), and on that same date, filed a motion seeking a temporary restraining order, expedited discovery, an expedited hearing, and a preliminary injunction. (Dkt. 3). Plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction restraining Defendants Michael Davis ("Davis"), Jacqueline Marie Sloan ("Sloan"), and
More

DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Genesee Regional Bank ("Plaintiff' or "GRB") commenced the abovecaptioned matter by the filing of a complaint on April 21, 2017, (Dkt. 1), and on that same date, filed a motion seeking a temporary restraining order, expedited discovery, an expedited hearing, and a preliminary injunction. (Dkt. 3).

Plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction restraining Defendants Michael Davis ("Davis"), Jacqueline Marie Sloan ("Sloan"), and PrimeLending, a PlainsCapital Company ("PrimeLending") (collectively "Defendants") from (1) making any use of or disclosing any customer information taken from GRB by Davis and Sloan; (2) permanently deleting or disabling any customer information taken from GRB by Davis and Sloan; (3) disclosing to and notifying GRB of the identities of all GRB customers that have been contacted by Davis or Sloan to solicit business or notifying the person of Davis and/or Sloan's employment with PrimeLending; (4) for expedited discovery allowing GRB to discover where the information taken by Davis and Sloan currently resides and the extent to which it has been used or disclosed by Defendants; (5) for costs, disbursements and attorney fees of this action, plus interest thereon; and (6) such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Plaintiffs motion for an expedited hearing (Dkt. 3) is GRANTED, and, as discussed on the record during a conference call with counsel for all parties today, Defendants shall submit any papers in opposition to Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction and expedited discovery on or before May 8, 2017; Plaintiff shall submit any reply papers on or before May 11, 2017; and the Court will hold oral argument on the motion on May 15, 2017, at 1:00 PM at the United States Courthouse, 100 State Street, Rochester, New York.

Additionally, for the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order (Dkt. 3) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and it is hereby

ORDERED, that pending the return date of the motion for a preliminary injunction, or until further Order of this Court, Defendants are temporarily enjoined and restrained from disclosing or making use of the documents and information expressly referenced in the Affidavit of Deanna Moore, sworn to on April 20, 2017, and filed at Docket 3-3, at paragraphs 12 through 16 and 18 through 21, inclusive, and the exhibits referenced therein and attached thereto as Exhibits B through EE; and,

FURTHER, that service of a copy of this Decision and Order, together with the papers upon which the same is granted upon counsel for Defendants, J. Nelson Thomas, Esq., and Anthony J. DiOrio, Esq., by either CM/ECF filing or overnight delivery, on or before April 26, 2017, shall be deemed good and sufficient service of this Order and the papers upon which the same is granted.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer