Nicholas v. Snider, 3:19-mc-00054. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. New York
Number: infdco20200218d70
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2020
Summary: ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY , Senior District Judge . Now, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' motion to transfer this discovery matter to the issuing court ("Motion to Transfer"), or alternatively, to compel Michael J. Rogers's compliance with Plaintiffs' subpoena issued in Case No. 4:18-CV-01631 (M.D. Pa.) ("Motion to Compel"), and Plaintiffs having duly served all interested parties with notice of the motion (Dkt. Nos. 2-3), and no response have been made thereto, and for good cause shown, it
Summary: ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY , Senior District Judge . Now, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' motion to transfer this discovery matter to the issuing court ("Motion to Transfer"), or alternatively, to compel Michael J. Rogers's compliance with Plaintiffs' subpoena issued in Case No. 4:18-CV-01631 (M.D. Pa.) ("Motion to Compel"), and Plaintiffs having duly served all interested parties with notice of the motion (Dkt. Nos. 2-3), and no response have been made thereto, and for good cause shown, it i..
More
ORDER
THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior District Judge.
Now, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' motion to transfer this discovery matter to the issuing court ("Motion to Transfer"), or alternatively, to compel Michael J. Rogers's compliance with Plaintiffs' subpoena issued in Case No. 4:18-CV-01631 (M.D. Pa.) ("Motion to Compel"), and Plaintiffs having duly served all interested parties with notice of the motion (Dkt. Nos. 2-3), and no response have been made thereto, and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Transfer (Dkt. No. 1) is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 1) shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania for consideration and disposition by the Honorable Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs' letter-motion (Dkt. No. 5) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
