Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

USA v. Jones, 1:16-cr-00039-MOC-DLH. (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20171215c44 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's pro se "Motion Under F.R.CIV.P. 18 USCS 4241(h)." Review of the pleadings reveals that defendant is being well represented by experienced counsel; thus, defendant's filing of a pro se motion is inappropriate as provided in Local Criminal Rule 47.1(g). Defendant should discuss with his excellent attorney any concerns he has as to his present custodial status. He is also cautioned not to make pro se
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's pro se "Motion Under F.R.CIV.P. 18 USCS § 4241(h)." Review of the pleadings reveals that defendant is being well represented by experienced counsel; thus, defendant's filing of a pro se motion is inappropriate as provided in Local Criminal Rule 47.1(g). Defendant should discuss with his excellent attorney any concerns he has as to his present custodial status. He is also cautioned not to make pro se filings with the Court as they may contain admissions or statements that could later be used against him by the government. Having considered defendant's pro se motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's pro se "Motion Under F.R.CIV.P. 18 USCS § 4241(h)" (#251) is DENIED without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer