Lassiter v. Hidalgo Medical Services, 17-cv-0850 JCH/SMV. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20180608e54
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER AWARDING EXPENSES UNDER RULE 37 STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Hidalgo Medical Services' Affidavit of Costs [Doc. 104], 1 filed on May 23, 2018. On May 16, 2018, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Compel [Doc. 93] and further ordered that Plaintiff pay Defendant's reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred in making their motion. [Doc. 102] at 5 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5)). Defendant claims $3,089.50 in ex
Summary: ORDER AWARDING EXPENSES UNDER RULE 37 STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Hidalgo Medical Services' Affidavit of Costs [Doc. 104], 1 filed on May 23, 2018. On May 16, 2018, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Compel [Doc. 93] and further ordered that Plaintiff pay Defendant's reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred in making their motion. [Doc. 102] at 5 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5)). Defendant claims $3,089.50 in exp..
More
ORDER AWARDING EXPENSES UNDER RULE 37
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Hidalgo Medical Services' Affidavit of Costs [Doc. 104],1 filed on May 23, 2018. On May 16, 2018, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Compel [Doc. 93] and further ordered that Plaintiff pay Defendant's reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred in making their motion. [Doc. 102] at 5 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5)). Defendant claims $3,089.50 in expenses. [Doc. 104] at 1. Plaintiff has not objected to the amount or reasonableness of the claimed expenses, and the time for doing so has passed. Further, the Court finds that the requested $3,089.50 is reasonable.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, no later than June 28, 2018, Plaintiff pay Defendant Hidalgo Medical Services $3,089.50, which is the reasonable expenses incurred in making its Motion to Compel [Doc. 93]. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Defendant initially filed an affidavit of costs that did not include the exhibit referenced in the affidavit. [Doc. 103]. Defendant subsequently filed an identical "corrected" affidavit of costs, including the exhibit. [Doc. 104].
Source: Leagle
