U.S. v. GUERRERO, 09 Cr. 339. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20141010a37
Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2014
Summary: OPINION AMENDMENT ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge. The opinion of this court dated October 2, 2014 (Dkt. No. 196) in the above titled action is hereby amended as follows: The sentence of the opinion reading "The sentencing opinion of January 19, 2012 ("Sentencing Opinion") provided that, subject to the sentencing hearing, the anticipated sentence was 25 years' imprisonment and five years' supervised release on each of the counts on which he was convicted, to run consecutively" shall be repla
Summary: OPINION AMENDMENT ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge. The opinion of this court dated October 2, 2014 (Dkt. No. 196) in the above titled action is hereby amended as follows: The sentence of the opinion reading "The sentencing opinion of January 19, 2012 ("Sentencing Opinion") provided that, subject to the sentencing hearing, the anticipated sentence was 25 years' imprisonment and five years' supervised release on each of the counts on which he was convicted, to run consecutively" shall be replac..
More
OPINION AMENDMENT
ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge.
The opinion of this court dated October 2, 2014 (Dkt. No. 196) in the above titled action is hereby amended as follows: The sentence of the opinion reading "The sentencing opinion of January 19, 2012 ("Sentencing Opinion") provided that, subject to the sentencing hearing, the anticipated sentence was 25 years' imprisonment and five years' supervised release on each of the counts on which he was convicted, to run consecutively" shall be replaced with the following language: "The sentencing opinion of January 19, 2012 ("Sentencing Opinion") provided that, subject to the sentencing hearing, the anticipated sentence was 25 years' imprisonment and five years' supervised release on each of the counts on which he was convicted, to run concurrently."
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
