JEFFERSON v. FERRER, POIROT AND WANSBROUGH, 3:10-0754. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20130709d13
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOHN S. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Jefferson, who is proceeding pro se , has filed his "Motion To Take Judicial Notice" (Docket Entry No. 155), to which he has attached two exhibits which he has labeled "Exhibit Truth #1" and "Exhibit Truth #2." Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides for circumstances in which a court may take judicial notice of certain adjudicative facts. The matters referenced in plaintiff's motion do not satisfy the requirements of this rule. Th
Summary: ORDER JOHN S. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Jefferson, who is proceeding pro se , has filed his "Motion To Take Judicial Notice" (Docket Entry No. 155), to which he has attached two exhibits which he has labeled "Exhibit Truth #1" and "Exhibit Truth #2." Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides for circumstances in which a court may take judicial notice of certain adjudicative facts. The matters referenced in plaintiff's motion do not satisfy the requirements of this rule. The..
More
ORDER
JOHN S. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Jefferson, who is proceeding pro se, has filed his "Motion To Take Judicial Notice" (Docket Entry No. 155), to which he has attached two exhibits which he has labeled "Exhibit Truth #1" and "Exhibit Truth #2."
Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides for circumstances in which a court may take judicial notice of certain adjudicative facts. The matters referenced in plaintiff's motion do not satisfy the requirements of this rule. Therefore, plaintiff's motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 155) is DENIED without prejudice to plaintiff's right to present evidence in a manner complying with the rules in support of or in opposition to a motion or at trial.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
