GREAT HARVEST FRANCHISING, INC. v. PANERA BREAD COMPANY, INC., 3:16-CV-121-GCM. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160413959
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice concerning William J. Utermohlen filed April 11, 2016 [doc. # 7]. Upon review and consideration of the Motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court hereby grants the motion. In accordance with Local Rule 83.1 (B), Mr. Utermohlen is admitted to appear before this court pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs, Great Harvest Franchising, Inc.
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice concerning William J. Utermohlen filed April 11, 2016 [doc. # 7]. Upon review and consideration of the Motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court hereby grants the motion. In accordance with Local Rule 83.1 (B), Mr. Utermohlen is admitted to appear before this court pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs, Great Harvest Franchising, Inc.,..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice concerning William J. Utermohlen filed April 11, 2016 [doc. # 7].
Upon review and consideration of the Motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court hereby grants the motion.
In accordance with Local Rule 83.1 (B), Mr. Utermohlen is admitted to appear before this court pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs, Great Harvest Franchising, Inc., Charlotte's Best Breads, LLC, and Our Daily Bread For Life, LLC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
