Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. LATHAM, 5:13cr50-2-RLV. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20130806946 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2013
Summary: ORDER RICHARD L. VOORHEES, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant's Motion To Continue from the September 3, 2013, criminal term, in the Statesville Division. For the reasons stated in Defendant's Motion and upon a showing that defense counsel has not had sufficient time within which to adequately prepare in this case, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, the Court will allow the continuance. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that
More

ORDER

RICHARD L. VOORHEES, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant's Motion To Continue from the September 3, 2013, criminal term, in the Statesville Division.

For the reasons stated in Defendant's Motion and upon a showing that defense counsel has not had sufficient time within which to adequately prepare in this case, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, the Court will allow the continuance. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by taking such action as requested by the Defendant outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant to a speedy trial.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for a continuance is GRANTED. This case is hereby continued from the September 2013, criminal term in the Statesville Division to the November 12, 2013, criminal term in the Statesville Division.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer