Robey v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 5:18-CV-00190-GCM. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190117i58
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER COMES before this Court on Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. No. 89). This matter came to this Court via transfer from the Southern District of Florida on December 6, 2018. In the Order transferring the case to this Court, the Court in the Southern District of Florida Denied as Moot Defendant's Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motions. Defendant now asks this Court to reconsider that ruling. The Court summarily declines to recon
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER COMES before this Court on Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. No. 89). This matter came to this Court via transfer from the Southern District of Florida on December 6, 2018. In the Order transferring the case to this Court, the Court in the Southern District of Florida Denied as Moot Defendant's Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motions. Defendant now asks this Court to reconsider that ruling. The Court summarily declines to recons..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER COMES before this Court on Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. No. 89). This matter came to this Court via transfer from the Southern District of Florida on December 6, 2018. In the Order transferring the case to this Court, the Court in the Southern District of Florida Denied as Moot Defendant's Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motions. Defendant now asks this Court to reconsider that ruling.
The Court summarily declines to reconsider the ruling of the Southern District of Florida. Rather than reconsider the motions as presented in the Southern District of Florida, this Court will allow Defendant to file any answer or other responsive pleading in this case with this Court, including the Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motions. Defendant will have twenty (20) days from entry of this Order to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint.
Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED without prejudice. Defendant will have twenty (20) days from entry of this Order to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint. This Order also rules upon Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. (Doc. No. 91). As such, the Clerk is directed to terminate that Motion as Moot.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
