Filed: Nov. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT (FIRST REQUEST) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff, LISA BONTA and Plaintiff's Representatives, Jill Gonzales and Bryce Mower, by and through their counsel, Terri Keyser-Cooper, of the Law Office of Terri Keyser-Cooper, Defendant WASHOE COUNTY, by and through its counsel, Christopher J. Hicks and Keith G. Munro, of the Washoe County District Attor
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT (FIRST REQUEST) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff, LISA BONTA and Plaintiff's Representatives, Jill Gonzales and Bryce Mower, by and through their counsel, Terri Keyser-Cooper, of the Law Office of Terri Keyser-Cooper, Defendant WASHOE COUNTY, by and through its counsel, Christopher J. Hicks and Keith G. Munro, of the Washoe County District Attorn..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiff, LISA BONTA and Plaintiff's Representatives, Jill Gonzales and Bryce Mower, by and through their counsel, Terri Keyser-Cooper, of the Law Office of Terri Keyser-Cooper, Defendant WASHOE COUNTY, by and through its counsel, Christopher J. Hicks and Keith G. Munro, of the Washoe County District Attorney's Office and Defendant CITY OF RENO ("City"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to the extend the date in which the defendants may respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF #25) and Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #47) through December 21, 2018.
This is the first request for such an extension. The parties have agreed to settlement in this matter. However, from a logistical standpoint, the parties will not be in a position to stipulate to dismissal until after responses to the First Amended Complaint and Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment responses were originally due, which is the reason for this Stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
