DAVISON v. STATE, 318 S.W.3d 312 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco101206001324
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 17, 2010
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2010
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Movant, Ted E. Davison, Jr., appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Ted E. Davison, Jr., appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
