ORDER

MICHAEL T. LIBURDI, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles (Doc. 47) regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 40). The R&R recommends that the Motion be denied. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 13) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Rules 6 and 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). Plaintiff filed objections on October 22, 2019 (Doc. 55). Defendants filed a response to Plaintiff's objections on November 5, 2019 (Doc. 62); Plaintiff filed a reply on November 12, 2019 (Doc. 65).

The Court has considered the objections, the response and reply thereto, and reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (stating that the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Plaintiff's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge"). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 47).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 40).