U.S. v. LaCHAPELLE, 3:11-CR-00337-RJC-DSC. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20141014j94
Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon its own motion upon the defendant's filing of a motion challenging the validity of the verdict on October 8, 2014, (Doc. No. 506). The Court finds that resolution of the motion requires a continuance of the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for October 21, 2014. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the above captioned case be continued to a date to be announced by separate order. The Clerk is directed to cer
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon its own motion upon the defendant's filing of a motion challenging the validity of the verdict on October 8, 2014, (Doc. No. 506). The Court finds that resolution of the motion requires a continuance of the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for October 21, 2014. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the above captioned case be continued to a date to be announced by separate order. The Clerk is directed to cert..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon its own motion upon the defendant's filing of a motion challenging the validity of the verdict on October 8, 2014, (Doc. No. 506).
The Court finds that resolution of the motion requires a continuance of the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for October 21, 2014.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the above captioned case be continued to a date to be announced by separate order.
The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this order to the defendant, counsel for the defendant, to the United States Attorney, the United States Marshals Service, and the United States Probation Office.
Source: Leagle
