PATEL v. BONNER, 10-6310. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110411088
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 11, 2011
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Kamal Patel appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patel v. Bonner , No. 5:08-ct-03110-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2010). We deny the motion to supplement the recor
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Kamal Patel appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patel v. Bonner , No. 5:08-ct-03110-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2010). We deny the motion to supplement the record..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Kamal Patel appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patel v. Bonner, No. 5:08-ct-03110-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2010). We deny the motion to supplement the record and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
