Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Boker v. U.S., 3:16-cr-92-MOC-1. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20190118993 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jan. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255, which was stamp-filed in this Court on January 3, 2019. See (Doc. No. 1). Judgment in the underlying criminal action was entered against Petitioner on May 1, 2018, and an Amended Judgment was entered on May 14, 2018. (Crim. Case No. 3:16-cr-92-MOC-1, Doc. No. 99: Judgment; Doc. No. 99: Amended Judgment). Petitioner filed a N
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which was stamp-filed in this Court on January 3, 2019. See (Doc. No. 1). Judgment in the underlying criminal action was entered against Petitioner on May 1, 2018, and an Amended Judgment was entered on May 14, 2018. (Crim. Case No. 3:16-cr-92-MOC-1, Doc. No. 99: Judgment; Doc. No. 99: Amended Judgment). Petitioner filed a Notice of Appeal on May 8, 2018, and his appeal before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals is currently pending. (Id., Doc. No. 94). As such, the petition is premature. The Court will, therefore, dismiss the motion to vacate without prejudice to Petitioner to refile the petition after resolution of his direct appeal.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate is DISMISSED without prejudice as premature.

JUDGMENT IN CASE

DECISION BY COURT. This action having come before the Court and a decision having been rendered;

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's January 17, 2019 Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer