Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. GLOVER, 3:11-cr-00010-MOC-DSC. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20141203b94 Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on Defendant's pro se Motion to Correct Clerical Error (#26). Defendant contends that the court made a clerical error in the judgment in this matter by failing to specify the amount of time that Defendant spent in detention while awaiting final disposition of his case. The court finds that no such clerical error exists, but will construe Defendant's motion as a Motion Concerning Sentence. Defendant asks the court to
More

ORDER

MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the court on Defendant's pro se Motion to Correct Clerical Error (#26). Defendant contends that the court made a clerical error in the judgment in this matter by failing to specify the amount of time that Defendant spent in detention while awaiting final disposition of his case. The court finds that no such clerical error exists, but will construe Defendant's motion as a Motion Concerning Sentence. Defendant asks the court to enter an order stating the amount of jail credit to which Defendant is entitled. However, Defendant is advised that calculation of service of a sentence, as well as jail credit, is left to the Bureau of Prisons. Accordingly, the court will issue no such order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant's pro se Motion to Correct Clerical Error (#26) is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer