U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 15-6291. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20150428143
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Lloyd Anthonie Williams appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's earlier order denying his "Petition for Resentencing," in which Williams sought relief under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. A district court lacks authority to grant a motion to reconsider its ruling on a 3582(c)(2) motion. United States v
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Lloyd Anthonie Williams appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's earlier order denying his "Petition for Resentencing," in which Williams sought relief under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. A district court lacks authority to grant a motion to reconsider its ruling on a 3582(c)(2) motion. United States v...
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Lloyd Anthonie Williams appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's earlier order denying his "Petition for Resentencing," in which Williams sought relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. A district court lacks authority to grant a motion to reconsider its ruling on a § 3582(c)(2) motion. United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order denying Williams' motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
