U.S. v. HINSON, 12-8074. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130429111
Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Lewis Hinson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hinson, No. 3:93-cr-00258-MOC-7 (W.D.N.C. June 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal co
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Lewis Hinson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hinson, No. 3:93-cr-00258-MOC-7 (W.D.N.C. June 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Lewis Hinson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hinson, No. 3:93-cr-00258-MOC-7 (W.D.N.C. June 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
