Filed: Jan. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . On December 18, 2018, plaintiffs moved to remand this action to Carteret County Superior Court [D.E. 10] and filed a memorandum in support [D.E. 11]. On January 3, 2019, defendants responded in opposition [D.E. 13]. On January 10, 2019, plaintiffs replied [D.E. 14]. The amount in controversy under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a) does not exceed $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. 1332(a); [D.E. 2-1]. Thus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c), this action REMANDED to Carte
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III , District Judge . On December 18, 2018, plaintiffs moved to remand this action to Carteret County Superior Court [D.E. 10] and filed a memorandum in support [D.E. 11]. On January 3, 2019, defendants responded in opposition [D.E. 13]. On January 10, 2019, plaintiffs replied [D.E. 14]. The amount in controversy under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a) does not exceed $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. 1332(a); [D.E. 2-1]. Thus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c), this action REMANDED to Carter..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER, III, District Judge.
On December 18, 2018, plaintiffs moved to remand this action to Carteret County Superior Court [D.E. 10] and filed a memorandum in support [D.E. 11]. On January 3, 2019, defendants responded in opposition [D.E. 13]. On January 10, 2019, plaintiffs replied [D.E. 14].
The amount in controversy under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) does not exceed $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); [D.E. 2-1]. Thus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), this action REMANDED to Carteret County Superior Court.
SO ORDERED.
