LEE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO., 1:11-CV-245-MR-DCK. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120215867
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (Document No. 12) concerning William C. Tucker, Jr., filed February 13, 2012. Mr. Tucker seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiff Charles T. Lee. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (Document No. 12) concerning William C. Tucker, Jr., filed February 13, 2012. Mr. Tucker seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiff Charles T. Lee. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule ..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice" (Document No. 12) concerning William C. Tucker, Jr., filed February 13, 2012. Mr. Tucker seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiff Charles T. Lee.
Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, Mr. Tucker is hereby admitted to appear before the Court pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff Charles T. Lee.
Source: Leagle