BELTON v. COLVIN, 1:14CV777. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150930g00
Visitors: 21
Filed: Sep. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . On August 24, 2015, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to the court. Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, counsel for Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation (Doc. 15), and Defendant filed a response (Doc. 16). The court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . On August 24, 2015, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to the court. Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, counsel for Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation (Doc. 15), and Defendant filed a response (Doc. 16). The court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to w..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
On August 24, 2015, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to the court. Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, counsel for Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation (Doc. 15), and Defendant filed a response (Doc. 16).
The court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection has been made. None of the objections change the substance of the outcome of the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for judgment reversing the Commissioner (Doc. 6) is DENIED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 10) is GRANTED, the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
Source: Leagle
