Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BELL v. DISNER, 3:14CV91. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20150113a20 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon its own motion. A status conference was held in this matter on January 8, 2014 Pursuant to discussions at the status conference, the Court has determined that the Receiver will have to bear some of Defendants' costs of hiring a rebuttal expert. Defendants are to obtain bids and submit to the Court a report outlining the bid process and the scope of the work, informing the Court of the identity of the expert that they
More

ORDER

GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon its own motion. A status conference was held in this matter on January 8, 2014 Pursuant to discussions at the status conference, the Court has determined that the Receiver will have to bear some of Defendants' costs of hiring a rebuttal expert. Defendants are to obtain bids and submit to the Court a report outlining the bid process and the scope of the work, informing the Court of the identity of the expert that they intend to hire, and including a budget. The Receiver's Request for Production of Documents is hereby stricken sua sponte as overly broad and burdensome. The parties are to confer regarding the scope of the interrogatories. In addition, the Defendants are to produce to the Receiver forthwith any documents relating to the collectability of any judgment and are to cooperate with the Receiver regarding the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer