Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Patel v. Aetna, 2:17-cv-78. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20180228g58 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY A. JOLSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed a Motion to Compel a Monetary Settlement Offer. (Doc. 31). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not permit the filing of such a Motion. Because this Court is without authority to order a party to produce a monetary settlement offer in this context, Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed a Motion to Compel a Monetary Settlement Offer. (Doc. 31). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not permit the filing of such a Motion. Because this Court is without authority to order a party to produce a monetary settlement offer in this context, Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer