Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LILLEY v. PEELER, 1:15cv128. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20150904990 Visitors: 23
Filed: Sep. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on August 10, 2015 (Doc. 34). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on August 10, 2015 (Doc. 34).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 15, 16, 22 and 26) are GRANTED based upon lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge; and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave for the DOJ, Civil Rights Division to Join Plaintiff in Americans with Disabilities Act Complaint (Doc. 31) is DENIED. This matter is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer