West v. Gettelfinger, 1:18-cv-184. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20181029539
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Bowman that this case has been successfully mediated and settled in the Court's presence; It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 45 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the sett
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Bowman that this case has been successfully mediated and settled in the Court's presence; It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 45 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settl..
More
ORDER
KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, Magistrate Judge.
The Court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Bowman that this case has been successfully mediated and settled in the Court's presence;
It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 45 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement.
The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
