White v. GE Healthcare, Inc., 1:17-cv-212. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190311642
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court following a telephone status conference held on March 5, 2019. The Court hereby ORDERS the following: 1. Defendant shall have its consulting expert conduct a non-destructive review of the existing tissue sample and, before doing any testing or analysis, notify plaintiff and the Court of the consulting expert's findings. 2. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to exchange a witness list and summary (Doc. 47
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court following a telephone status conference held on March 5, 2019. The Court hereby ORDERS the following: 1. Defendant shall have its consulting expert conduct a non-destructive review of the existing tissue sample and, before doing any testing or analysis, notify plaintiff and the Court of the consulting expert's findings. 2. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to exchange a witness list and summary (Doc. 47)..
More
ORDER
KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court following a telephone status conference held on March 5, 2019. The Court hereby ORDERS the following:
1. Defendant shall have its consulting expert conduct a non-destructive review of the existing tissue sample and, before doing any testing or analysis, notify plaintiff and the Court of the consulting expert's findings.
2. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to exchange a witness list and summary (Doc. 47) is GRANTED.1 Plaintiff shall exchange the witness list and summary with defendant within twenty-eight (28) days. Thereafter, defendant is GRANTED an additional twenty-eight (28) days to respond to the witness list and summary.
3. The discovery deadline in this matter is extended an additional thirty (30) days until April 4, 2019. Defendant shall produce to plaintiff the documents that were previously produced to plaintiff's former attorney. At this time, defendant is not obligated to answer plaintiff's discovery requests, including interrogatories, requests for admission, and requests for production of documents.
4. A follow-up telephone status conference is scheduled for Monday, April 8, 2019 at 3 P.M. Plaintiff may address any deficiencies in discovery and whether she is entitled to additional discovery at the conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Court notes that plaintiff propounded her discovery requests on defendant on February 25, 2019, less than 30 days before the discovery deadline of March 7, 2019 and in violation of the Court's standing order on civil procedures. However, in light of plaintiffs pro se status, the Court finds that an extension of the discovery deadline is still justified.
Source: Leagle
