Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HANKS v. KEITH, 1:13-CV-02999. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20161228786 Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES T. TRIMBLE, Jr. , District Judge . For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (Doc. 86), noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 78) is GRANTED as to Hank's claims against Walker and Horne for failure to investigate, and that Hanks' claims against Walker and Horne for
More

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (Doc. 86), noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 78) is GRANTED as to Hank's claims against Walker and Horne for failure to investigate, and that Hanks' claims against Walker and Horne for "failure to investigate" is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 78) is GRANTED as to Hanks's claims for compensatory damages for the urine-throwing incidents of October 2014 and April 15, 2015, and for the small scratch he received in the October 2013 inmate assault. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 78) is DENIED as to Hanks's claims for nominal and punitive damages for those incidents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 78) on Hanks's claim for failure to protect him from sexual assault by other inmates on April 23, 2015 is DENIED.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer