STATE v. PENDERGRAFT, 776 S.E.2d 679 (2015)
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Number: inncco20150925c38
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2015
Summary: PER CURIAM . Justice ERVIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416 , 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010). AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM.
Justice ERVIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
