RICKER v. COLVIN, 12-00664-CL. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20130731f18
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2013
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report ahd Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Respondent filed objections, petitioner filed a response to respondent's objections, and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309 , 1313 (9th. Cir. 1981). I have given this matter de
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report ahd Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Respondent filed objections, petitioner filed a response to respondent's objections, and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309 , 1313 (9th. Cir. 1981). I have given this matter de n..
More
ORDER
OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report ahd Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Respondent filed objections, petitioner filed a response to respondent's objections, and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th. Cir. 1981).
I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly. I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#19). The decision of the administrative law judge is reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDEBED.
Source: Leagle
