STAHLE v. CTS CORPORATION, 1:14-cv-00048-MOC-DLH. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140610d11
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on its own motion lifting the stay. The Supreme Court issued its decision in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger , No. 13-339, ___ U.S. ___ (June 9, 2014), reversing the appellate court and affirming the district court, which had determined that an action similar to the one now before this court was barred by the statute of repose. The court will, therefore, lift the stay and require defendant to answer or otherwise respond to th
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on its own motion lifting the stay. The Supreme Court issued its decision in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger , No. 13-339, ___ U.S. ___ (June 9, 2014), reversing the appellate court and affirming the district court, which had determined that an action similar to the one now before this court was barred by the statute of repose. The court will, therefore, lift the stay and require defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on its own motion lifting the stay. The Supreme Court issued its decision in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, No. 13-339, ___ U.S. ___ (June 9, 2014), reversing the appellate court and affirming the district court, which had determined that an action similar to the one now before this court was barred by the statute of repose. The court will, therefore, lift the stay and require defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint within 14 days.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the previously imposed STAY (#9) is lifted and defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint within 14 days.
Source: Leagle
