FILER v. POLSTON, 3:11-CV-170. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120516d30
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 15, 2012
Latest Update: May 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Recognizing that the Court earlier today recommended that this case be dismissed, the following motions are each denied as MOOT : Doc. 20 (Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Subpoena for Production of Trial Preparation Documents against U.S. Airways at Dayton International); Doc. 21 (Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel); and Doc. 23 (Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings). IT IS SO
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Recognizing that the Court earlier today recommended that this case be dismissed, the following motions are each denied as MOOT : Doc. 20 (Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Subpoena for Production of Trial Preparation Documents against U.S. Airways at Dayton International); Doc. 21 (Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel); and Doc. 23 (Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings). IT IS SO O..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Recognizing that the Court earlier today recommended that this case be dismissed, the following motions are each denied as MOOT: Doc. 20 (Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Subpoena for Production of Trial Preparation Documents against U.S. Airways at Dayton International); Doc. 21 (Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel); and Doc. 23 (Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
