Filed: Mar. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER EDMUND V. LUDWIG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 21st day of March 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Plaintiff's Motion for Remand and her brief in support thereof (collectively, Doc. 9), Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs Request for Review (Doc. 11), and Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Doc. 14), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Repor
Summary: ORDER EDMUND V. LUDWIG, District Judge. AND NOW, this 21st day of March 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Plaintiff's Motion for Remand and her brief in support thereof (collectively, Doc. 9), Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs Request for Review (Doc. 11), and Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Doc. 14), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report..
More
ORDER
EDMUND V. LUDWIG, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of March 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Plaintiff's Motion for Remand and her brief in support thereof (collectively, Doc. 9), Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs Request for Review (Doc. 11), and Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Doc. 14), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo.
