Gregory v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC, 1:17-cv-00226-MR. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190115e20
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Stay. [Doc. 60]. The Claimants in Interpleader (hereinafter the "Savignac Claimants") oppose the Plaintiffs' Motion. [Doc. 63]. The Court stayed the present action and directed the parties to file ongoing status reports "until such time as the Motion for Relief from Judgment in Case 80-DR-000084 in the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial District in Hillsborough Count
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Stay. [Doc. 60]. The Claimants in Interpleader (hereinafter the "Savignac Claimants") oppose the Plaintiffs' Motion. [Doc. 63]. The Court stayed the present action and directed the parties to file ongoing status reports "until such time as the Motion for Relief from Judgment in Case 80-DR-000084 in the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial District in Hillsborough County..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Stay. [Doc. 60]. The Claimants in Interpleader (hereinafter the "Savignac Claimants") oppose the Plaintiffs' Motion. [Doc. 63].
The Court stayed the present action and directed the parties to file ongoing status reports "until such time as the Motion for Relief from Judgment in Case 80-DR-000084 in the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial District in Hillsborough County, Florida, is resolved." [Doc. 59 at 2]. Upon review of the Plaintiffs' Motion and the Savignac Claimants' Response thereto, it appears that the Motion for Relief from Judgment remains pending in the Florida state court action. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs' request to lift the stay in this action is denied.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Stay [Doc. 60] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
