Barfield v. Doe, 1:16-cv-1149. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180824b11
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doe. 37) OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT TIMOTHY S. BLACK , District Judge . This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 31, 2018, submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37). No objections were f
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doe. 37) OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT TIMOTHY S. BLACK , District Judge . This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 31, 2018, submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37). No objections were fi..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doe. 37) OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 31, 2018, submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37). No objections were filed.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety. Accordingly:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37) is ADOPTED;
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b);
3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)(3), an appeal of this Court's Order would not be taken in good faith; and
4. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is terminated in this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
