COLLICK v. HEFFNER, 15-5423. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160119742
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15 th day of January 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Doc. Nos. 12, 15) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 12) (ECF Doc. No. 15) are GRANTED. As Plaintiff cannot, as a matter of law, state federal claims based on prison officers' decisions regarding the location for his medical care and any amendment would be futile, Plaintiffs
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15 th day of January 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Doc. Nos. 12, 15) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 12) (ECF Doc. No. 15) are GRANTED. As Plaintiff cannot, as a matter of law, state federal claims based on prison officers' decisions regarding the location for his medical care and any amendment would be futile, Plaintiffs C..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of January 2016, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Doc. Nos. 12, 15) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 12) (ECF Doc. No. 15) are GRANTED. As Plaintiff cannot, as a matter of law, state federal claims based on prison officers' decisions regarding the location for his medical care and any amendment would be futile, Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
