Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MADSEN v. COLVIN, 3:13-cv-819-CL. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20140701b93 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309 , 13
More

ORDER

OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

Here, plaintiff objects to the Findings and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de novo. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner's finding that plaintiff is not disabled. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (#22) is adopted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer