Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marsh v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:19-CV-05564-MLP. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20200124i18 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2020
Summary: SEATTLE DIVISION ORDER MICHELLE L. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will direct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to update the record, offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing, and issue a new decision. To this end, the ALJ will reevaluate Plaintiff's
More

SEATTLE DIVISION ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will direct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to update the record, offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing, and issue a new decision. To this end, the ALJ will reevaluate Plaintiff's subjective complaints. The ALJ will reassess the nature, severity and limitations associated with Plaintiff's attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The ALJ will reassess Plaintiff's residual functional capacity and determine whether Plaintiff can perform his past relevant work or other jobs existing in the national economy. The ALJ may obtain medical expert or supplemental vocational evidence, as needed and available.

Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, upon proper request to this Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer