ROBINSON v. COLVIN, 14-1649. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150512c32
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 11, 2015
Latest Update: May 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG , District Judge . AND NOW, this 11 th day of May, 2015, upon careful and independent consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, the response and reply thereto, along with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, and there being no objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. P
Summary: ORDER MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG , District Judge . AND NOW, this 11 th day of May, 2015, upon careful and independent consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, the response and reply thereto, along with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, and there being no objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Pl..
More
ORDER
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2015, upon careful and independent consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, the response and reply thereto, along with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, and there being no objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED to the extent that the matter is remanded to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED.
Source: Leagle
