Brown v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution, 3:17-cv-80. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180226c34
Visitors: 30
Filed: Feb. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2018
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 32) to the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 31). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 32) to the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 31). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to f..
More
RECOMMITTAL ORDER
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 32) to the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 31).
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a second supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis.
Source: Leagle
