SHAMBERGER v. BELLEQUE, 1-09-cv-1266-CL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20120413942
Filed: Apr. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2012
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#32), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, I review the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd. , 700 F.2d 1202 , 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude the Rand R is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#32) is adopted. Petition (#2)
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#32), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, I review the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd. , 700 F.2d 1202 , 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude the Rand R is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#32) is adopted. Petition (#2) i..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#32), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, I review the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude the Rand R is correct.
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#32) is adopted. Petition (#2) is DENIED and this action is dismissed. Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
