U.S. v. LOWERY, 3:05-cr-216. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120718938
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se to follow a "non-routine procedure" in his case. (Doc. No. 216). In the motion, the defendant offers to drop his lawsuit against police officers in exchange for dismissal of the criminal charges against him. ( Id. at 3). The defendant's 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against police officers was previously dismissed, (No. 3:11-cv-327, Doc. No. 9: Order); the defendant's convicti
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se to follow a "non-routine procedure" in his case. (Doc. No. 216). In the motion, the defendant offers to drop his lawsuit against police officers in exchange for dismissal of the criminal charges against him. ( Id. at 3). The defendant's 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against police officers was previously dismissed, (No. 3:11-cv-327, Doc. No. 9: Order); the defendant's convictio..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se to follow a "non-routine procedure" in his case. (Doc. No. 216).
In the motion, the defendant offers to drop his lawsuit against police officers in exchange for dismissal of the criminal charges against him. (Id. at 3). The defendant's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against police officers was previously dismissed, (No. 3:11-cv-327, Doc. No. 9: Order); the defendant's conviction and sentence in the criminal case were affirmed on appeal, (No. 3:05-cr-216, Doc. No. 214: Opinion); and the Court's denial of the defendant's motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is on appeal, (No. 3:09-cv-260, Doc. No. 7: Notice of Appeal). Therefore, there is no further action for this Court to take in this matter.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motion to follow a non-routine procedure is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
