DROXLER v. COLVIN, 13-4539. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140910b57
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge. AND NOW , this 9 th day of September 2014, upon consideration of Judge Rueter's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 14), and no objections being filed thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The report and recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 1 2. The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED . FootNotes 1. Since the government has not filed objections, I need only give some reasoned consideration of the report and recommendation. Hende
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge. AND NOW , this 9 th day of September 2014, upon consideration of Judge Rueter's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 14), and no objections being filed thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The report and recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 1 2. The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED . FootNotes 1. Since the government has not filed objections, I need only give some reasoned consideration of the report and recommendation. Hender..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of September 2014, upon consideration of Judge Rueter's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 14), and no objections being filed thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The report and recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;1
2. The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED.
FootNotes
1. Since the government has not filed objections, I need only give some reasoned consideration of the report and recommendation. Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987). I have reviewed Judge Rueter's Report and Recommendation and find it to be well reasoned and free of clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note.
Source: Leagle
