KEYS v. CARROLL, 3:10-CV-1570. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120223c80
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW , this 22 nd day of February, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Parties are Directed to submit a Case Management Order within fourteen (14) days of this Order. 2. Parties' Motions for Extension of Discovery Deadlines (Doc. 95 and 96) are deemed MOOT . 3. Plaintiff's Motion to Suppress the Use of Depositions by Defendants (Doc. 129) is deemed WITHDRAWN . 4. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Depositions and Compel Legal Materials (Doc. 47) is dee
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW , this 22 nd day of February, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Parties are Directed to submit a Case Management Order within fourteen (14) days of this Order. 2. Parties' Motions for Extension of Discovery Deadlines (Doc. 95 and 96) are deemed MOOT . 3. Plaintiff's Motion to Suppress the Use of Depositions by Defendants (Doc. 129) is deemed WITHDRAWN . 4. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Depositions and Compel Legal Materials (Doc. 47) is deem..
More
ORDER
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Parties are Directed to submit a Case Management Order within fourteen (14) days of this Order.
2. Parties' Motions for Extension of Discovery Deadlines (Doc. 95 and 96) are deemed MOOT.
3. Plaintiff's Motion to Suppress the Use of Depositions by Defendants (Doc. 129) is deemed WITHDRAWN.
4. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Depositions and Compel Legal Materials (Doc. 47) is deemed MOOT.
5. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants Walsh, Mooney, Klopotoski and Zakarauskas to Answer Plaintiff's Request for Admissions and Interrogatories (Doc. 71) is GRANTED.
6. Plaintiff's Motions to Compel Discovery (Docs. 41, 59, 100 and 127) are GRANTED IN PART. The Corrections Defendants are directed to produce materials in a manner consistent with Part I of the accompanying Memorandum. Insofar as these motions seek monetary sanctions, they are DENIED.
7. Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions against Defendant Fedor for Failure to Disclose (Doc. 138) is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant Fedor is directed to respond to the two interrogatories in a manner consistent with Part II of the accompanying Memorandum. Insofar as this Motion seeks monetary sanctions, it is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
