Stockdale v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Ins. Co., 19-845. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190619d79
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District judge . AND NOW , this 17th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and briefing in support thereof (ECF Nos. 10 & 20), and Plaintiff's briefing in opposition thereto (ECF Nos. 17 & 24), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's individual claims is DENIED ; 2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's putative
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District judge . AND NOW , this 17th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and briefing in support thereof (ECF Nos. 10 & 20), and Plaintiff's briefing in opposition thereto (ECF Nos. 17 & 24), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's individual claims is DENIED ; 2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's putative c..
More
ORDER
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District judge.
AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and briefing in support thereof (ECF Nos. 10 & 20), and Plaintiff's briefing in opposition thereto (ECF Nos. 17 & 24), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's individual claims is DENIED;
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's putative class claims is GRANTED as to those class members whose claims are based upon a breach of an alleged insurance contract "by reason of the household exclusion" prior to January 23, 2015.
Source: Leagle
